OGM Stewards Jam Sesh, 2021-04-13

Note: if you're viewing/editing this on HackMD, the double-bracket links to other wiki pages won't be active. Ping Pete about connecting your Obsidian to OGM Wiki.

If you're reading this on HackMD and want to edit, click the "Edit" button at the top right, then the pencil or double-page icon at the top left.

If you're reading this on GitHub and want to edit on HackMD, go to: https://hackmd.io/OTlsBX3bT1y1dt-DVsgOXQ

Agenda

Check in as people.
Discuss how to chunk meeting and what to do if we have overflow agenda items.
Check-in on our collective bat signal.
- In OGM Stewards Jam Sesh, 2021-03-30, we agreed to use @channel in the Stewards channel in Mattermost, with reasonably low latency for responses.
Recap/review Friday/Saturday/Sunday Jerry/Judy/Pete stewardship meetings.
Recap/review OGM + Lionsberg General Counsel, 2021-04-06.
- Discuss newly added legal section.
[Inviting Lionsberg to visit the OGM family living room].(https://chat.collectivesensecommons.org/agora/pl/fxmre34e5pdxbx7ruo7c8x3jnh)
Review Stewardship Dashboard items.
Discuss next steps.
Check out as people.

Next Up

work on Focused SoW (ask Jerry/Judy/Pete for more context)

Bat Signal

jordan / jamaica invitation
- ˜cone of silence

Recap/Review Jerry/Judy/Pete Stewardship Meetings

Pete's Project Management Headlines

The most recently published version of the SoW (in the MoU) specifies a lot of work, in very general ways. We will need more hands, better teamwork, and fine-grained specification of actionable outcomes before it is a SMART plan that I can sign off on.
I believe there are prerequisites that need to be lined up before it makes sense to start the clock on the Launch Sprint. I suggest we have a "Prep Sprint" that is bound to yes/no checkoffs on prerequisites, rather than time, before we commit to starting the Launch Sprint.
One of the primary prerequisites is enough committed hands and teamwork/coordination to do the work. Hands may be volunteer or paid or a combination. If paid, another prerequisite is money to pay them.
Given our present minimal clarity around sprint velocity and effort estimation, I think a six-month Launch Sprint allows too much accumulated uncertainty in the out months for predictable delivery, and I recommend a shorter two- or three-month Launch Sprint instead.

Site Navigation